MG3 for a LINUX-DAW or for Rasperry a small version, would that still be interesting for someone maybe in the future?
it would be neat to build it right into the guitar.
and w11 appears to be just as messy as w10 re: latency, and possibly even worse. so it is time for musicians to move away from microsoft.
mac you say? never owned one. based on the beta testing feedback, it certainly doesn’t appear that they have an advantage.
but, if linux is the future os of music workstations, how could jam o protect itself against the theft of their software? is there a non-invasive thumb key option (ie: not ilok)? if so, that would be my preference.
1 Like
I have used mg2 for years on Linux, using wine for the standalone and the vst in reaper. Everything works for me.
here’s hoping that record continues with MG3
1 Like
The requests keep coming and are becoming more and more realistic in terms of technical feasibility…
And the Raspberry 5 is probably also powerful enough for an MG3 Mini version as a pedal.
i think the raspberry pi5 is still one generation away from being capable enough to run mg3.
in side by side tests, it lags behind the intel n100. iirc, another member here said that the n100 isn’t powerful enough to run mg3.
another issue is that it requires cooling if you want to run cpu intensive stuff on it.
the jamstik guys seem to have solved this, i wonder what cpu they’re using. their least expensive option is $560, the cpu/audio part of that can’t be more than a couple of hundred bucks.
@Kimyo, you are absolutely right, it would be very challenging to make an (experimental) mini version of MG3 for Raspberry 5 now.
Raspberry is of course a widely used and it is attractive for many hobbyists because it is so cheap.
So let’s keep hoping for a better future when Raspberry 6 comes or something else that would be usable enough for an MG3 pedal 